Military Courtesy and Respect Essay

Good citizenshipA good citizen needs to imbibe galore(postnominal) qualities. That he has some duties and responsibilities to bear is true, but at same time, he enjoys some rights and privileges as a citizen of a free state. While he has all right to participate in the judicial, legal politics, religious and social affairs of the nation, he has also some responsibilities i.e. not to injure the sentiments of others and to protect the weak against the strong. To tolerate by the state, under all conditions, is his first and foremost duty. A good citizen must be ready to sacrifice his everything for the sake of his motherland. He is also require to be a patriot and nationalist. He should have firm and deep faith in the welf are of his motherland. He has to obey law and order. But he has also to keep in his heart the betterment of the country, the good of society and the interest of the nation.A good citizen must respect the cultural heritage of his country, i.e. he will have to respe ct the heroes, the prophet, the sages and saints of his country. He must respect the race which has given birth to him. He must always keep in headspring the future of his country. He must attempt to raise the standard of living of his country by working honestly. At an event of aggression or conflicting attack, he must be ready to shed his blood for the sake of his motherland. Thus, defense of the country is the supreme duty of a good citizen. Unity of the nations should be his topmost priority. He should work for the unity of the country.A goodwill for other races, protection to the weak, help to the victims, sympathetic and kind consideration to his fellow citizens are things that are needed in good citizen. A good citizen should have a spirit of cooperation, friendliness, humanity, dedication, devotion for his fellow citizens. He must respect other faiths. He must not do anything which brings disgrace to his society or to his country. Greatest good of greatest take should be his principle. All these good and great qualities, if possessed, produce one a good citizenMilitary leadership Within the U.S. military, leadership is generally considered something of a given. It is a fundamental ingredient of warfare, without which the outcome of a encounter operation cannot be assured. The leader is the brain, the motive power of command, upon whom subordinates rely for guidance and wisdom, anddepend upon for good judgment. The leader must be determined, unflappable and charismatic surefooted in delegation of authority able to combine the various strands of command into a common thread seasoned, intelligent, and thoughtful.When judging the qualities of leadership, there is a tendency to echo of the gifted, or natural leader, involving some expectation that leadership is an inherent personality quality that some have, and others have not. Military history is full of born leaders, suggesting that stimulate leadership is the only true measure of the trait. For a very long time the American people relied on the emergence of beneficial such an someone when necessity demanded it, and fortunately the country has been wellserved in this respect. Much of this has been due to American military egalitarianism, which presumed that any individual, regardless of background, could lead a body of serviceman in combat as long as the leader had the requisite ability.An obvious case in point is the Civil War, which gave rise to a number of gifted commandersJoshua Chamberlain, Nathan Bedford Forrest, John Logan, and Nelson A. Miles, to name but a fewwho yet had little, if any, military training. So great was the renown of such natural leaders that a veritable school of military command grew up around them, declaring that genius alone was the true marker of leadership, and that leaders were born, not made.As the army develop and professionalized after the Civil War, these sorts of arguments met the resistance of educational reformers who argued that ce rtain principles of leadership could be taught, given the proper lessons from military history.Military ingenuity and desipline Military courtesy is essentially no different from courtesy in civilian life, just good manner and politeness in dealing with other people. The experience of life has be that courteous behavior is essential in human relations. The distinction between civilian courtesy and military courtesy is that, military courtesies were developed in a military atmosphere and have become customs and traditions of the service. Most forms of military courtesy have some counterpart in civilian life. For example, you are necessitate to saySir or Maam when you talk to an officer. Throughout our history, young men and women were taught to say Sir to their fathers and other male elders. and Maam to their mothers, unknown women and womanly elders.This tradition is still carried on and it is considered good manners for a younger man to say Sir when speaking to an older man. T he use of the word Sir or Maam is also common in the business world, in the address of letters, and in any well-ordered institution. Military courtesy is not a one-way street. Enlisted personnel must be courteous to officers, and officers are expected to return the courtesy. Officers respect soldiers as individuals, just as you respect officers as individuals. Without this basis of unwashed respect, there can be no military courtesy, and discord will result.One of the most important of military courtesies is the salute. It is a respectful greeting, a sign of recognition between military persons. It is that, and no more. Salutes are given and returned. They are a privilege of the military alone. Every officer salutes every other officer, just as every enlisted man salutes every officer. The highest-ranking general in the Army is required to return the salute of the newest private. The fact that the subordinate salutes first is simply common-sense courtesy applied to a military expre ssion it is for the same reason that gentlemen step aside for ladies in doorways and younger people are