Rhetoric in William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar Essay

Throughout discordant plays and pieces, elaborateness is utilise to shake pillow slips into committing to a signifi bumt trifleion or decision. In William Shakespeares plays, rhetoric is wontd regularly by characters that plan to persuade others into doing indisputable actions that satisfy their own personal opinions and needs. As it can deport to more dangerous outcomes, the art of persuasion, evoked done uses of rhetoric, can be seen as a lethal weapon that has the power to cause damage and harm. Similarly, the use of rhetoric also has the power to reveal truths and identities, that declare been hidden and unplowed secret and are however able to be discovered through and through the schematic initiation of persuasion. To completely persuade someone else, a character must use rhetoric to overcome one of three chance on decision-making detailors Logos, Pathos, and Ethos. In William Shakespeares Julius Caesar, appeals to Logos, Pathos, and Ethos are effectively used to reveal character, as seen in Cassius, Antony, and Brutus respectively, throughout the play.Cassius chooses to persuade different characters through appeals to Logos, which indicates his true qualities and aspects, and how they think over his motifs. To appeal to Logos, one must appeal to the logical side of a persons mentality they must use reasoning and syllogism to persuade another person into believing that their opinion is completely logical, and is therefore the surpass decision to make. This can be seen in Cassius numerous times, and it establishes how he is calculating, logical, and cold. In the second flick of the first act, Cassius tells Brutus that Caesar is not the godly king the he sets himself up to be, and persuades Brutus that Caesar must be overthrown. Cassius convinces Brutus that Caesar is not fit for the thrown by using recollections of past experiences, in which Caesar can be seen as tenuous and impotent, to insult Caesar and convince Brutus that he is surely not strong abundant to be crowned the leader of Rome, His coward lips did from their colour fly, and that same eye whose bending doth awe the world did lose his lustre. (1.2.122-124)The message is that Caesar is weak, and is no stronger than the honest mortal Ro sm every(prenominal)(prenominal)-arm. If Caesar is weak and frail, how will he be able to lead an entire nation? This use of syllogism appeals to Brutus Logos, and convinces him that it is save logically fit to have a strong and capable man as leader, if there were to be a leader, through the simple cause-and-effect method. This is an example of Cassius being calculating, logical, and cold as he calculates that Brutus can be persuaded through a fair, syllogistic appeal, he uses logic to show Brutus evidence that Caesar is weak, and he is cold to the fact that Brutus is a very close friend of Caesar, and that turning such good friends against distributively other would be dis just, disrespectful, and inconsiderate to the bond they share and the significance of their relationship.Antony uses rhetoric through appeals to Pathos to effectively persuade others, and this reveals how he can be seen as wise, empathetic, and loyal. An appeal to Pathos is an appeal to emotion, rather than logic or credibility. Antony understands the power of ones emotions, and uses his knowledge of this to persuade people into delicious his needs by convincing them that their emotional desires are the most reasonable factor in making a decision. In the second scene of the third act, Antony gives a moving speech to the Plebians about Caesars death, and how he believes it was a traitorous act by the conspirators, and that his murder must be punish. Antony knows full well that the common mob is not an intellectual theme in the slightest, and chooses to appeal to emotions in an emotionally overwhelmed crowd, showing that he is smart and clever.To persuade the Plebian audience into fully believing that Caesar did not deser ve to die, Antony decides to require Caesars death as a personal loss to severally individual Plebian by overstating the fashion in which Caesar was killed, and by exaggerating the betrayal of Caesars close friend, Brutus, Through this the well-loved Brutus stabbd, and as he pluckd his utter steel away, mark how the blood of Caesar followd it, as travel out of doors to be resolvd if Brutus so unkindly knockd or no, for Brutus, as you know, was Caesars angel. (3.2.174-179) By dramatizing Caesars death, Antony convinces the Plebians that Caesar, the man they had loved so much, did not deserve to die in such a gruesome agency, betrayed by his close friends, and thus causes the Plebians to feel stubborn and vengeful for the death of such a seemingly innocent man. By persuading the Plebians into believing that Caesars death must be avenged through an exploitation of their emotional dominance in the decision making process, Antony can be seen as empathetic, as he understands the emo tional connection mingled with the Plebians and Caesar and uses it to his advantage, and loyal, as he desires, so strongly, for his best friend to be avenged for such a heinous and disloyal crime.Ethos is Brutus rhetorical device of choice, and his various uses of it to persuade other characters shows that he is proud, honourable, and nave. In the first act of the second scene, Cassius brings the conspirators to Brutus house, where they discuss their plan to kill Caesar. Up until this point in the play, Brutus declares that he is very honourable towards his morals, and only does what he believes is right after considering both sides of an argument. Thus, Brutus can be seen as honourable, and proud of his morals, honour and the fact that he always contemplates the right decision by considering the significance of from each one factor. Much like the way Brutus presents himself in such a manner during the beginning of the play, Brutus can also be seen as honourable and dress through his uses of rhetoric.In this specific scene, Brutus insists that an fellow is unnecessary, as they are all honourable men and plan on doing what is best for Rome, No, not an oath If not the face of men, the sufferance of our souls, the times abuse-If these be motives weak, sound off betimes, and every man hence to his idle bed so let high-sighted tyranny range on, till each man roam by lottery . (2.1.114-119) Here, Brutus tries to persuade the conspirators into becoming honourable, if they already arent, and believing that their only motif for killing Caesar should be for the greater good of the Roman Republic.This shows that Brutus has pride, as he believes that his mentality of honour is the best mentality for this decision, and he is honourable, as he believes that their actions should only be the most honourable ones. However, Brutus pride in his honour causes him to be nave and blind to the fact that not every one of the conspirators agrees with his honourable mentality. Br utus pride causes him to believe that his personal mentality is the only feasible mentality, and renders him blind to the fact that the conspirators are not killing Caesar for Brutus honourable reasons. By becoming completely absorbed to the belief that their only possible motif is for honour, Brutus causes himself to be nave, through his own honour and pride.